一辆在售的中国装甲车让美国网友猜测纷纷!
2014-07-03 10:40 我要评论(1)
Strange, Unused Chinese Gov’t “Armored Car”For Sale in the U.S
奇怪,从未用过的中国政府的“装甲车”在美国出售
This week in WTF news — the Chinesegovernment called upon a Minnesota-based tuning house to build them an“armored” car that is “not actually bullet proof.” Even stranger, they paid forit and then never picked it up.
WTF本周新闻——之前,中国政府要求明尼苏达州一家改装厂建造一辆“装甲”车,而这辆装甲车并没有防弹能力。更奇怪的是,中国政府支付了费用却没来提货。
The vehicle in question can be seen here.It’s an “armored” vehicle, based on a Polaris Ranger 6×6 800, and has a topspeed of somewhere around 40 mphwithout a turbo kit. Automotive Concepts, the tuning house responsible for thebuild, said that the Chinese government commissioned the project toPolaris, which then referred officials to Automotive Concepts, theMinnesota-based tuning house in question.
这辆车辆如图所示。这是以北极星漫游者6×6 800为基础而制造出来的“装甲”车,在没有配备涡轮增压机的情况下最高时速大约可达到40英里。这家叫做AutomotiveConcepts的改装公司说中国政府先是把这个项目给了北极星公司,后来北极星公司又把中国官员介绍给了他们。
What AutomotiveConcepts did then, was remove all the body panels from the original Rangerand build a custom “armored” car look. Again, it’s not actually bulletproof.They even tossed on a turbo kit to boost the top speed from 40 mph to what we expect can only besomewhere near 60 mph. Allthis, of course, isn’t even street legal.
当时AutomotiveConcepts公司所做的就是把漫游者的车体外板全部拆除,然后改装成“装甲”车的样子。但是并不具备防弹功能。他们甚至给这辆车安装了一个涡轮增压机,使得时速从原来的40英里上升到60英里。而实际上,这样做开上街头是违法的。
But the story gets weirder from there.Chinese officials allegedly paid for the vehicle up until about a year and ahalf ago. Since then, Automotive Concepts states that they “went silent,”leaving the Minnesota tuning house with this strange creation to rot intheir parking lot.
但是更加奇怪的还在后面。据说中国官员大约一年前支付了这辆车的费用。Automotive Concepts公司称从那以后就再也没有任何消息了,他们只能把这辆奇怪的车停在停车场里。
Now, Automotive Concepts is trying to getit off of their hands. As mentioned it’s not street legal, and it has a topspeed of probably somewhere near 60 mph.But they they’re willing to part with it for about the same price as a newPolaris Ranger 6×6 800 with a turbo, or $19,999.
现在,该公司想要摆脱这辆车。如上面所说的,这辆车开上道路是违法的,而且其最高时速可达60英里。但是他们愿意以类似北极星漫游者6×6 800新车的价格出售,还配备了一个涡轮增压机,也就是19999美元。
So if you’re in the market for a Chinesegovernment armored car that isn’t street legal and makes you look like acommunist, here it is. It isn’t listed on their site, but you can contact ACMotors here ifyou feel so inclined. (ed. note- what is a tuning shop in MN doing buildingconcept vehicles for the Chinese gov’t? How has no one asked this yet?)
所以如果你想购买一辆中国政府的装甲车并且是一辆不能开上道路的车的话,那么就买这辆车吧。这辆车的商品信息没有列在他们的网站上,但如果你真的想买的话,请点击这里here。
以下是美国网友评论:
Johnny 4 minutes ago I think the Chinese designers had a roughtime coming up with their own concept for this vehicle.
So they contracted with a foreign company to come up with the design and theywill take it from there.
They did not need the product delivered, as they only needed to see the design concept.
They did not need armor plating on this model since it would raise the cost forthe prototype. The "real" ones that they will start producing locallywill be armor plated, complete with Polaris Ranger knock-offs and really reallyshort shock troopers.
The US outsources labor to China, they outsource R&D to the US.
我觉得可能是中国设计师在做这个车的概念设计时遇到了困难,所以他们联系了一家外国公司,让这家外国公司去做这个设计,设计做好后,他们直接获得设计概念就可以了。 但他们并不需要成品,他们只需要获得这个设计概念。 在做这个车的原型时,他们没必要让这辆车具备防弹功能,因为这会增加原型的成本。而他们在自己国内建造的那些“真正的”装甲车将被安装上装甲,然后再窃取北极星漫游者的技术,这样真正的装甲车就造出来了。 美国把劳动外包到中国,中国把研发外包到美国。
Jess 8 hours ago This requires a REALLY comment. Who intheir right mind would buy a vehicle which looks like an armored car and is hasno plating on it which would make it an armored car? Then again why would Chinacontract a american corporation to build a military vehicle when they havetheir own companies?
这确实有点奇怪。正常人哪里会去购买不具备防弹功能的装甲车呢?而且中国在自己国内有公司可以建造的情况下为什么要美国公司来建造军事车辆呢?
thomas 8 hours ago Might be for a Chinese movie?
中国人为了拍电影而要求制造这辆车?
Lastarkio 7 hours ago Well, if this is legit, maybe theycommissioned one, copied the design, & now will mass produce their own. Butthe fact that its not bullet proof means it's not really armored. Guess everycar from the 70s down made with steel can be considered Armored by today's standards..
如果这是合法的,或许他们要求建造这么一辆车,然后抄袭了设计,最后在国内大量生产。但这辆车并不具备防弹功能,所以并非真正意义上的装甲车。以如今的标准看,我觉得70年代以来的钢制汽车都可以算是装甲车。
Stumbling_rabbit 7 hours ago Unlike the average American citizen, theaverage Chinese citizen doesn't own a gun. So it only needs to stop rocks andsuch things in an urban setting.
不像普通美国人,一般中国人并不拥有枪支。所以中国城市里的装甲车一般只用来抵御石头之类的东西。
Traveler... 7 hours ago I am willing to bet that China was going touse this as a blueprint and then have their own companies clone it but make itan actual armored vehicle.
我觉得中国肯定是抄袭了这辆车的概念,然后让自己的公司在国内大量生产,而且令其具备防弹功能。
Jack 7 hours ago Would not work, the suspension system wouldbuckle under the added weight. the US military had this problem with armoredHumvee, until they also beefed up other parts. And this is a vehicle deignedfor heavy weight not like a Ranger.
没用的,如果增加了额外的重量,悬架系统将无法支撑。美军的悍马装甲车也遇到了类似问题,直到他们加强了其他部件。而且这辆车在设计上是一种重型车,不像漫游者。
Carl Bruschnig 6 hours ago The Chinese do this kind of thing all thetime. There's a company in my city that designs and build very large cranes.The Chinese ordered two of them at several million each, payment on finalinspection. The company builds the cranes, calls the Chinese.
The Chinese then cancel the order and refuse to pay.
Then, when the company hits the skids, the Chinese offer to buy the cranes atpennies on the dollar.
The company told them to kiss themselves where the sun don't shine.
中国人老是做这种事情。在我所住的城市里有一家设计和建造巨型起重机的公司。中国人以每辆几百万美元的价格订购了两辆,要最终查看成品后才付款。该公司在建造好后联系了中国人。 可是中国取消了订单并拒绝付款。 随后,当这家公司开始走下坡路时,中国人又希望以极低的价格来购买这些起重机。 该公司叫他们去死,。
DiverMike 1 hour ago To demonstrate to their own people orneighbors that "Made in America" means low quality? Just a guess.
中国这么做的目的是为了向自己人民或者邻国表明“美国制造”意味着低品质吗?我猜的。
ChloeS 4 hours ago China ordered the car to have the best carbuilt in America, while they spied on the plans and stole the design to copy asit was being built. No delivery necessary. It was going to be copied anyways.
中国向美国公司订购车辆,要求美国公司建造出最好的汽车,随后对这些汽车计划进行暗中监视,然后在建造的过程中窃取了设计。如此一来,他们就不需要建造出来的成品了。反正中国人就是抄袭啦。
XiaodongL 26 minutes ago The red star painted on the door isdifferent from real Chinese army star logo. Check it on the internet.
这辆装甲车门上的红星标志和中国军队的红星标志是不一样的,去网上查查。
Real 44 minutes ago A cool item for any Republican politician, sincethey hate doing anything that actually benefits the average American.
这个东西很适合共和党政治家啊,因为他们不愿意做任何有利于普通美国民众的事情。
Francine 1 hour ago While travelling through Minnesota a coupleof weeks ago, we saw a strange vehicle sitting in a lot with other vehicles forsale. We couldn't figure out what it was, and lo and behold here it is. Mysterysolved.
几周前我还去了一趟明尼苏达州,看到停车场里停着这辆车,和其他一些车一起放在那里出售。我们当时还真不知道这是什么东东,现在明白了。
voice 16 minutes ago Most likely the reason this vehicle was notbullet proof is because if it was, it would be considered a tool for war. Sucha thing needs to be approved by congress in order to sell the real deal toanother country. Now a model, or mock up of one is another story, where theChinese could just take the model and produce a real one off of it. It is afterall what they do best, copy .
这件东西之所以没有防弹功能,很可能是因为如果具备了防弹功能的话就会被认为是战争机器。而向别国出口战争机器是需要得到国会的批准的。而如果仅仅是模型的话,那就是另外一回事了,中国人可以利用这个模型生产出真正的装甲车。反正中国人最擅长抄袭了。
John 2 hours ago They're lying. China makes their own thatare bulletproof. These people are just lying to get advertisement.
他们在说谎,中国自己造的装甲车都是可以防弹的。这家公司之所以说谎,是为了给自己打广告。
Joseph 3 hours ago U.S. police departments would love them. Itwould help further militarize the nation's police forces, at a low cost.
美国警察部门会喜欢这种车辆的,因为可以以更低的成本对美国的警察力量进行进一步的军事化。
postalwaite 3 hours ago Its priced low enough that the Minutemen onthe Texas border could probably use it.
如果价格足够低的话,德克萨斯州边境的民防兵或许可以使用这种车辆。
请支持独立网站,转载请注明本文链接:http://fm.m4.cn/2014-07/1236565.shtml
文章来源:龙腾网 | 责任编辑:沙枣花
- 中国科技超越韩国 未来核心科技差距更大
- 克里米亚回归俄罗斯10周年
- 网友讨论:日本经济给人的警示
- 美国会发生社会主义革命吗?
- 日媒:绿色氢能,美国想与中企竞争
- 阿桑奇的引渡将表明西方是否存在"自由"
- 看美国脸色,韩国企业正错失中国市场
- 没有中国参与 新能源转型将额外支出20%
- 突发!全美再度疯狂裁员
- 红海危机表明中国的"一带一路"至关重要
- 美国"印太经济框架"正在失去吸引力
- 反驳"中国经济见顶" 陆克文点出三件事
- 美国发明了购物中心 但中国人谱写新篇章
- 2024全球选举年:是政治转变的一年?
- 中国多部畅销小说今年将与俄读者见面
- 2023年的政治事件:乌克兰、加沙、金砖国家
- 韩媒:中国的未来没有这"三个东西"
- Ian|2024年,澳洲要降息!
- 美国政客为什么害怕中国大蒜?
- 美国电动汽车市场凉了?
- 1占豪丨中国改变世界的大招正在起关键作用!
- 2坏土豆|莫斯科恐怖袭击的真凶!全面战争将
- 3常规武器中的顶尖之作:体积爆炸物(ОДБ
- 4美国四胞胎妈妈秀400万美元帐单 网友震惊
- 5卞海涛丨菲律宾侵占仁爱礁的图谋不会得逞
- 6国防部:坚决反对美凭空制造敌人的危险做法
- 7细数美军工复合体如何获取“战争暴利”
- 8国防部:只要不搞“台独”,就没必要焦虑
- 9牛弹琴丨这件事,特朗普真做不到
- 10后沙:《杜鹃花落》,文责自负!
- 11胡懋仁|西方大公司放弃电动汽车意味着什么
- 12中方强烈不满,已向韩方交涉
- 13邱国正之子被爆涉黄 台安全部门已立案调查
- 14普京将彻查恐袭幕后主使 西方多国牵涉其中
- 15司马南|"莫斯科郊外的晚上"恐袭最新进展
- 16以色列士兵肆意打砸加沙商店取乐
- 17以色列北部遭火箭弹袭击 1人死亡
- 18俄军又击毁一辆美制"阿布拉姆斯"坦克
- 19巴勒斯坦武装派别巷战伏击以军装甲车
- 20安理会强烈谴责巴基斯坦恐怖袭击事件
- 1江平舟|莫斯科恐袭 美国事先就知情?
- 2申鹏|他们实现“美国梦”了吗?
- 3胡懋仁|西方资产阶级带来的观念害人不浅
- 4突发!俄军发动“最大规模”夜袭
- 5占豪丨"巴恐"瞄准中国下黑手 不能容忍!
- 6俄自媒体揭露:全球恐怖势力竟源自单一团伙
- 7马斯克:美国需要一股"红色浪潮",否则就完
- 8深得法国精髓:民众在美高官住宅前倾倒粪便
- 9乌国安国防秘书长侮辱中国特别代表被解雇
- 10索纳丽丨你美国人买不起电动汽车,这就是原
- 11占豪丨中国改变世界的大招正在起关键作用!
- 12外媒:第聂伯河水电站被炸,现场曝光
- 13肖志夫|“人工智能”正在颠覆现代战争形态
- 14扎哈罗娃评联合国立场:是谴责不是感到悲痛
- 15重大突破!中国完成首列氢能源列车运行试验
- 16牛弹琴|跨国谋杀案还真是印度特工干的!
- 17"中国速度太快"!德国总理朔尔茨"羡慕了"
- 18天都新闻丨莫斯科恐袭五个关键信息值得关注
- 19陈金龙|试论毛泽东的历史自信
- 20中国留俄学生:我现在做的只能是来献血
- 1夜央 占豪|央视“国骂”令万千网友“破防
- 2罗思义|美国耗费巨资试图说服中国内部各种
- 3许多人曾崇拜西方价值观,但现在幻想破灭…
- 4胡懋仁|兰德公司的两份报告
- 5戴旭丨很多国人不知反毛背后的大阴谋,令人
- 6张文木 | 政治的膨胀与政治的文本——历史
- 7美军公布:六代机最新进展……
- 8江平舟|莫斯科恐袭 美国事先就知情?
- 9李瑞昌|对毛主席最好的纪念是什么?
- 10牧心 占豪|中美同时拒签 这一默契将引发重
- 11金灿荣|大陆海警重拳反击 台湾问题快要解
- 12司马南|美国为什么怕中国汽车?
- 13科罗廖夫|温压弹能让敌人缺氧而死 谣传!
- 14牛弹琴|这两个最新动向,让人瞠目结舌
- 15张文木丨德国宣战后 苏军上报斯大林的报告
- 16乔新生|特里芬难题决定了美国经济不可能软
- 17统一"绊脚石"正被踢开!蔡英文最怕一幕发生
- 18申鹏|这岛上,又岂止“三害”?
- 19远航|台独是美国豢养的一条狗
- 20亨利·曼斯|美国面临的危险程度远超俄罗斯
网友评论