英学者驳CNN等西方媒体:“天安门袭击”绝对是恐怖主义(全文)

2013-11-04 12:25 作者:亚历山德罗 我要评论(1)

关键词:天安门 恐怖主义 CNN

核心提示:亚历山德罗在文中驳斥了少数西方媒体此前“怀疑论”,称10月28日的“天安门袭击”绝对是恐怖主义行径。他认为,这场袭击是什么就应称之为什么:恐怖主义。我们拥有充分的材料断言,袭击的目的是明确致命的。此外,袭击地点肯定具有重大象征意义。此地不仅政治火药味很浓,而且是国际观察家注意的中心。

日本《外交学者》网站11月3日刊登题为《天安门袭击是什么就叫它什么:恐怖主义》(Call Tiananmen Attack What It Was: Terrorism),作者为英国阿伯丁大学社会人类学博士候选人亚历山德罗•里帕(Alessandro Rippa)。亚历山德罗在文中驳斥了少数西方媒体此前“怀疑论”,称10月28日的“天安门袭击”绝对是恐怖主义行径。他认为,这场袭击是什么就应称之为什么:恐怖主义。我们拥有充分的材料断言,袭击的目的是明确致命的。此外,袭击地点肯定具有重大象征意义。此地不仅政治火药味很浓,而且是国际观察家注意的中心。

亚历山德罗最后发问,为什么西方媒体承认这一点就这样难?为什么学者和记者们似乎更为担心中国断言东突运动卷入上周一的袭击没有真凭实据,而不去关注这场袭击的悲剧性本身?

CNN报道天安门恐怖袭击

CNN报道天安门事件:恐怖袭击还是绝望的呐喊?

以下为全文内容。

对于10月28日发生在天安门前的袭击,大多数西方媒体和新疆问题学者的反应方式有令人深感不安之处。正如广泛的报道所说,此次袭击造成5人死亡,其中两人为游客,还造成40人受伤。在袭击中,一名男子带驾驶一辆越野车冲入人群,将车付之一炬。袭击发生后不久,中国当局确认肇事者为维吾尔族人。

从那时以来,西方专家频频出现在媒体上,企图辨析这起悲剧事件。

10月31日,即悲剧过后三天,乔治•华盛顿大学副教授肖恩•罗伯茨为美国有线电视新闻国际公司(CNN)撰文,罗伯茨是西方主要的新疆问题专家之一,他曾严重质疑“东突厥斯坦伊斯兰运动”作为一个强悍的恐怖主义组织的存在。在其文章中,罗伯茨称,由于缺乏透明度和细节,所以我们也许永远也不会知道上周一究竟发生了什么,就甭提证明袭击者与任何全球性穆斯林好战组织有牵连了。

罗伯茨在文章第二部分分析了中国在新疆的政策和维吾尔族的边缘化,并且中国历来将新疆视为自己的领土。罗伯茨称,这样才能理解这次“暴力行为”。最终,问题变成了“天安门袭击事件是一起精心准备的恐怖袭击,还是一个挣扎在中国巨大发展机器边缘的民族仓促组织的绝望呐喊。”

同日,另一位新疆问题学者、英国格拉斯哥大学讲师戴维•托宾(David Tobin)在博客上发表了与此相似的观点。同样地,文章对中国官方为透露事件细节表示担忧,并建议称,如果我们想要明白这次袭击事件,我们需要了解新疆的安全问题是如何运作。托宾也强调说,中国对维吾尔族自由和权利的限制是维族不满的一个因素,维族的这一现状导致了这类袭击,包括此次天安门袭击事件。

我曾在新疆生活,在该地区进行了广泛的调研。那么,我发现究竟什么事情如此令人不安呢?

在上述两项分析中,令我感到困扰的是,两位作者如此轻易地就打消了对这场袭击本身的顾虑。当我阅读这些文章时,我感到,甚至在这场袭击没有发生的情况下,他们本来也会阐述这些观点。文内的假设似乎是,天安门所发生的事情仅仅是我们近年来已经见证的反复发生的暴力活动的又一实例而已。但是,情况果真如此吗?天安门袭击事件会是一次转折点吗?

难以理解的是,为什么人们很少承认,天安门袭击是恐怖主义行径。

诚然,我们没有机会——而且大概永远也没有——了解到所有细节。但是我相信,我们拥有充分的材料断言,袭击的目的是明确致命的。此外,作为中华人民共和国的政治中心,袭击的地点肯定具有重大象征意义。但那里也几乎整日充斥着中外游客。

因此,此地不仅政治火药味很浓,而且是国际观察家注意的中心。

我发现,很难相信这两个因素不是袭击者考量的一部分。

此外,一般情况下让恐怖主义如此令人不安的是其滥杀无辜。当波士顿、伦敦、马德里或任何其他西方城市出事时,我们不断地被提醒关注这一点。媒体的报道涉及受害者、他们的背景,以及他们如何恰好在不该在的时候,身处不该在的地点。北京发生的袭击的情况为什么不是如此?我多年来一直生活在北京。我到过天安门多次。

今年夏季,我父母首次访问中国。我带他们去了天安门。我有一张照片,就是他们在这两位游客上周一死去的地方拍摄的。我本来也可能死,我的父母本来也可能死。我的北京邻居、我的中国老师、我的挚友,本来都可能在上周一的袭击中死去。

这场袭击是什么就应称之为什么:恐怖主义。但这为什么这样难?为什么学者和记者们(请看看英国广播公司和《纽约时报》的报道)似乎更为担心中国断言东突运动卷入上周一的袭击没有真凭实据,而不去关注这场袭击的悲剧性本身?

我同意大部分分析,中国关于新疆恐怖主义的声明还不十分清楚。我知道,我们也许永远都不会知道此次袭击背后的动机到底是宗教的、政治的还是个人性质的。我也很清楚,我们永远都不会知道袭击者与东突伊斯兰运动恐怖组织间关系的证据。然而,与我之前的考虑不同,我现在很确定,中国经历的是一次意在杀戮无辜群众、吸引关注的蓄意袭击。一句话:恐怖主义。正是这种确定,让天安门袭击事件成了一个意义重大的转折点,是我们在分析中国政府回应时应该考虑的因素。

当然,学者和记者调查、质疑中国政府在新疆的政策问题是很重要的。同时我相信,事情该是什么样他们就说成什么样,这也很重要。讨论在天安门此次事件的良好开端应该是这次袭击是什么就该称之为什么:一次恐怖袭击。

(翻页请看英文原文)

Call Tiananmen Attack What It Was: Terrorism

By Alessandro Rippa

There is something profoundly disturbing about the way most Western media and Xinjiang scholars have reacted to the attack in Tiananmen Square last Monday. As has been widely reported, the attack left five people dead, two of whom were tourists, and 40 injured.

Shortly after the attack, in which a man with his wife and mother drove an SUV into a crowd of people and set it on fire, Chinese authorities identified the perpetrators as Uyghurs. Since then, Western experts have appeared in the media, attempting to shed some light on the tragic event.

On October 31, three days after the tragedy, Sean R. Roberts wrote a piece for CNN significantly headlined “Tiananmen crash: Terrorism or cry of desperation?” Roberts is one of the leading Western experts on Xinjiang, and author last year of an important report in which he casts serious doubts on the existence of the ETIM as a capable terrorist organization. In his CNN article, Roberts argues that given the lack of transparency and details we might never know what exactly happened on Monday, let alone prove that the attackers were tied to any global Muslim militant movement.

To understand this “act of violence,” as Roberts calls it, the second part of the article moves into an analysis of Chinese policies in Xinjiang and the marginalization of the Uyghurs in what they perceive as their historical homeland. The question, eventually, is whether “Monday's alleged attack was a well-prepared terrorist act or a hastily assembled cry of desperation from a people on the extreme margins of the Chinese state's monstrous development machine.”

The same day, another Xinjiang scholar, David Tobin, offered a similar perspective from his blog in a post that was then republished by Beijingcream. The post shares the concerns about the lack of details provided by the Chinese authorities, and suggests that if we want to make sense of the attack then we need to understand how security works in Xinjiang. Once again, China’s restrictions on Uyghur freedom and rights are responsible for Uyghur discontent, a situation that could lead to attacks such as that in Tiananmen.

Both Roberts and Tobin offer very insightful analysis into the complex range of problems that are likely to be behind Monday’s attack. I have lived in Xinjiang and conducted extensive research in the region, and find myself in total agreement with most of what they are saying. So what is it then, that I find so disturbing?

What bothers me, in both analyses, is the facility with which the authors dismiss the attack itself. Paradoxically, as I was reading the pieces, I felt that they could have made the very same points without the attack even having taken place. What happened in Tiananmen, it seems assumed, is just another example of the repeated violence we have witnessed in recent years, ultimately rooted in Beijing’s disastrous policies in Xinjiang. But is this really the case? Isn’t Tiananmen a turning point?

What is hard to understand is why the attack in Tiananmen is rarely acknowledged as an act of terrorism. Granted, we don’t – and probably never will – have access to all the details, and yet I believe we have enough material to claim that the attack was clearly intended to be deadly. The place of the attack, moreover, certainly has major symbolic value as the political center of the PRC, but it is also packed with Chinese and foreign tourists at virtually all hours. It thus isn’t just politically charged, but also in the spotlight of international observers. I find it hard to believe that both these factors weren’t part of the attackers’ calculations.

Moreover, what generally makes terrorism so disturbing is the randomness of the victims. We are constantly reminded of this when something happens in Boston, London, Madrid or any other Western city. Media run stories on the victims, their backgrounds, and how they happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Why hasn’t this been the case with Monday’s attack in Beijing? I have lived in Beijing for years and I visited Tiananmen many times. This summer, for the first time, my parents visited China. I took them to Tiananmen, I’ve got a picture of them in the very same place where the two tourists died on Monday. I could have died, my parents could have died. My Beijing neighbor, my Chinese teacher, my best friend: all could have died in Monday’s attack.

Why is it so difficult, then, to call the attack what it is: terrorism? Why do scholars and journalists (see, for instance the BBC and NYT) seem more concerned about the weakness of China’s claims that the ETIM was involved in Monday’s attack, rather than in the tragedy of the attack itself?

Once again, I agree with most analysts that China’s claims concerning Uyghur terrorism have been unclear at best. I understand that we will probably never know whether the main motivation behind the attack was religious, political or personal. I’m also quite sure that we will never be provided with proof of the attackers’ link with the ETIM. And yet, in contrast to my previous thinking, I’m now sure that what China experienced was a deliberate attack intended to kill innocent people and attract notice. In a word: terrorism. It is this certainty that makes the Tiananmen attack a significant turning point, and something that we should take into account when analyzing Beijing’s response to it.

It is surely very important that scholars and journalists investigate and question the Chinese government’s accusations and discuss its policies in Xinjiang. It is also important, I believe, that they call things what they are. A good discussion about what happened in Tiananmen should begin by calling the attack what it really was: an act of terrorism.

请支持独立网站,转载请注明本文链接:http://fm.m4.cn/2013-11/1216040.shtml

四月网声明:专栏作者观点,不代表本站立场。

文章来源:观察者网 |

顶踩排行榜 打印本文

关键词:天安门 恐怖主义 CNN

用户名: 快速登录 注册
array(16) { [0]=> array(11) { ["contentid"]=> int(1297333) ["icon"]=> string(0) "" ["iconsrc"]=> string(0) "" ["title"]=> string(60) "朱维群:达赖与暴力恐怖主义的关系能撇清吗" ["color"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(46) "http://www.m4.cn/opinion/2015-12/1297333.shtml" ["subtitle"]=> string(0) "" ["suburl"]=> string(0) "" ["thumb"]=> string(47) "http://upload.m4.cn/2015/1225/1451012368803.jpg" ["description"]=> string(259) "12月初,十四世达赖接受意大利媒体采访,称“仍有必要与IS对话,需要倾听、理解,给予所有的尊重”、“对要砍头的人如何倾听呢?只有用心来倾听敌人”。这番言论招致国际舆论的一致谴责。" ["time"]=> int(1451012400) } [1]=> array(11) { ["contentid"]=> int(1297348) ["icon"]=> string(0) "" ["iconsrc"]=> string(0) "" ["title"]=> string(67) "什么仇什么怨 西方为何对“妖魔化中国”情有独钟" ["color"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(46) "http://www.m4.cn/opinion/2015-12/1297348.shtml" ["subtitle"]=> string(0) "" ["suburl"]=> string(0) "" ["thumb"]=> string(47) "http://upload.m4.cn/2015/1225/1451028973285.jpg" ["description"]=> string(349) "由于很多圣诞礼物都写着made in china(中国制造),以至于70%西方小朋友认为圣诞老人是中国人。或许在西方孩子的眼中中国人的形象就是那个戴着红帽子,穿着红色的棉衣,脚穿红色靴子,有着白胡子的慈祥老爷爷,但是在西方大人的眼里中国人却是另一番样子。" ["time"]=> int(1451029018) } [2]=> array(11) { ["contentid"]=> int(1297347) ["icon"]=> string(0) "" ["iconsrc"]=> string(0) "" ["title"]=> string(57) "请善待我们救援者,哪怕我们只找到一只鸡" ["color"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(46) "http://www.m4.cn/opinion/2015-12/1297347.shtml" ["subtitle"]=> string(0) "" ["suburl"]=> string(0) "" ["thumb"]=> string(47) "http://upload.m4.cn/2015/1225/1451027495611.png" ["description"]=> string(260) "微博认证为蓝天救援队的外联部长@蓝天碎叫12月23日晚上发表了长博文《请善待我们救援者,哪怕我们只找到一只鸡》,文中那句“我在十米深的泥坑里凿着墙,你在敲着键盘骂我娘”让网友感叹。" ["time"]=> int(1451027559) } [3]=> array(11) { ["contentid"]=> int(1297341) ["icon"]=> string(0) "" ["iconsrc"]=> string(0) "" ["title"]=> string(45) "安轩平:打好意识形态斗争主动仗" ["color"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(46) "http://www.m4.cn/opinion/2015-12/1297341.shtml" ["subtitle"]=> string(0) "" ["suburl"]=> string(0) "" ["thumb"]=> string(47) "http://upload.m4.cn/2015/1225/1451020867548.jpg" ["description"]=> string(714) "中国纪检监察报点名批评某高校教授冯某以“真相”、“揭秘”为噱头,大肆宣扬历史教科书中的党史很多都不是“真实的历史”,捏造事实,歪曲党史军史,以混淆视听。这充分说明,当前意识形态领域的斗争复杂而尖锐,一些错误思潮暗流涌动,此起彼伏,竞相发声,大肆攻击中国特色社会主义、中国共产党的领导、社会主义核心价值观等,我们必须旗帜鲜明地把意识形态斗争作为事关党和国家生死存亡的大事来看,作为信仰之争、主义之争、制度之争的政治战来打,以共产党人的高度智慧和坚定意志,打好打赢意识形态主动仗。" ["time"]=> int(1451020875) } [4]=> array(11) { ["contentid"]=> int(1297325) ["icon"]=> string(5) "blank" ["iconsrc"]=> string(0) "" ["title"]=> string(66) "环球时报:香港极端反对派亟需搞清自己“是谁”" ["color"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(46) "http://www.m4.cn/opinion/2015-12/1297325.shtml" ["subtitle"]=> string(0) "" ["suburl"]=> string(0) "" ["thumb"]=> string(47) "http://upload.m4.cn/2015/1225/1451010268306.jpg" ["description"]=> string(273) "香港极端反对派给全国社会做了很低劣的“民主”示范,“港式民主”意味着政治对抗、社会动荡、人群撕裂以及经济发展被搅乱等等,包括一些稀奇古怪的现象会伴随出笼,这就是它给内地很多人的印象。" ["time"]=> int(1451010301) } [5]=> array(11) { ["contentid"]=> int(1297321) ["icon"]=> string(0) "" ["iconsrc"]=> string(0) "" ["title"]=> string(66) "李云飞阿訇:伊斯兰文明从制度上败给了西方文明" ["color"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(46) "http://www.m4.cn/opinion/2015-12/1297321.shtml" ["subtitle"]=> string(0) "" ["suburl"]=> string(0) "" ["thumb"]=> string(47) "http://upload.m4.cn/2015/1225/1451009743802.png" ["description"]=> string(192) "阿拉伯字母仍是仅次于拉丁字母的世界上使用最广泛的文字系统,伊斯兰文明也是当今人类社会唯一有可能把西方文明取而代之的世界文化体系。" ["time"]=> int(1451009766) } [6]=> array(11) { ["contentid"]=> int(1297292) ["icon"]=> string(0) "" ["iconsrc"]=> string(0) "" ["title"]=> string(81) "罗思义:中国在毛泽东治下取得了世界史上最伟大的社会成就" ["color"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(46) "http://www.m4.cn/opinion/2015-12/1297292.shtml" ["subtitle"]=> string(0) "" ["suburl"]=> string(0) "" ["thumb"]=> string(47) "http://upload.m4.cn/2015/1225/1451003936527.jpg" ["description"]=> string(210) "我们此前已经比较分析了中国1978年改革开放前后的经济增长情况。尽管如此,如果不了解1949年至1978年改革之前所取得巨大的社会成就,我们仍可能会被误导。" ["time"]=> int(1451003943) } [7]=> array(11) { ["contentid"]=> int(1297318) ["icon"]=> string(0) "" ["iconsrc"]=> string(0) "" ["title"]=> string(33) "香港特首进京也“跑部”" ["color"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(46) "http://www.m4.cn/opinion/2015-12/1297318.shtml" ["subtitle"]=> string(0) "" ["suburl"]=> string(0) "" ["thumb"]=> string(47) "http://upload.m4.cn/2015/1225/1451008702623.png" ["description"]=> string(179) "按照惯例,香港和澳门的特首每年在12月底时都会来北京向国家领导人汇报全年工作,也就是所谓的“述职”,再通俗点就是年终总结。" ["time"]=> int(1451008771) } [8]=> array(11) { ["contentid"]=> int(1297303) ["icon"]=> string(0) "" ["iconsrc"]=> string(0) "" ["title"]=> string(42) "虎牙妹:《万万没想到》有点渣" ["color"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(46) "http://www.m4.cn/opinion/2015-12/1297303.shtml" ["subtitle"]=> string(0) "" ["suburl"]=> string(0) "" ["thumb"]=> string(47) "http://upload.m4.cn/2015/1225/1451005863619.png" ["description"]=> string(228) "由于《万万》在网络剧时期累积了不小的人气,电影在点映时取得了相当大的成功,正当人们以为它能取得票房佳绩的时候,《万万》的风评却急转直下,在豆瓣上评分6.1。" ["time"]=> int(1451005740) } [9]=> array(11) { ["contentid"]=> int(1297295) ["icon"]=> string(0) "" ["iconsrc"]=> string(0) "" ["title"]=> string(72) "马平:作为前工程师,我认为深圳滑坡事故是这么回事" ["color"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(46) "http://www.m4.cn/opinion/2015-12/1297295.shtml" ["subtitle"]=> string(0) "" ["suburl"]=> string(0) "" ["thumb"]=> string(47) "http://upload.m4.cn/2015/1225/1451004166233.jpg" ["description"]=> string(183) "一般来说,规划和建设部门会分别对建设区附近的地质条件进行勘探,分析地质灾害的可能性。对于可能出现滑坡的地段,应该进行治理。" ["time"]=> int(1451004167) } [10]=> array(11) { ["contentid"]=> int(1297290) ["icon"]=> string(0) "" ["iconsrc"]=> string(0) "" ["title"]=> string(45) "寒竹:中国历史中的社会主义根基" ["color"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(46) "http://www.m4.cn/opinion/2015-12/1297290.shtml" ["subtitle"]=> string(0) "" ["suburl"]=> string(0) "" ["thumb"]=> string(47) "http://upload.m4.cn/2015/1225/1451003740374.jpg" ["description"]=> string(213) "在经济领域进一步深化市场化导向的改革,是当下中国发展的一个重要方向。市场能够最大限度地实现资源的有效配置,从而给经济发展提供强大而持续的动力。" ["time"]=> int(1451003764) } [11]=> array(11) { ["contentid"]=> int(1297248) ["icon"]=> string(0) "" ["iconsrc"]=> string(0) "" ["title"]=> string(69) "自导自演的和平演变:越南反共总理政治炒作的背后" ["color"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(46) "http://www.m4.cn/opinion/2015-12/1297248.shtml" ["subtitle"]=> string(0) "" ["suburl"]=> string(0) "" ["thumb"]=> string(47) "http://upload.m4.cn/2015/1224/1450949829631.png" ["description"]=> string(303) "越南中央级的党报党刊、军报军刊最近发表大量文章,阐述党的路线和大政方针,同时揭露、批判“国内外各种敌对势力和政治机会主义分子”在十二大前的各种破坏阴谋和伎俩,强调要防范和反对“和平演变”和“颜色革命”。" ["time"]=> int(1450949950) } [12]=> array(11) { ["contentid"]=> int(1297247) ["icon"]=> string(0) "" ["iconsrc"]=> string(0) "" ["title"]=> string(42) "津巴布韦缘何“相中”人民币?" ["color"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(46) "http://www.m4.cn/opinion/2015-12/1297247.shtml" ["subtitle"]=> string(0) "" ["suburl"]=> string(0) "" ["thumb"]=> string(47) "http://upload.m4.cn/2015/1224/1450948423306.png" ["description"]=> string(140) "中国是津巴布韦的第二大贸易合作伙伴,每年双边贸易额超过10亿元,津巴布韦对人民币的需求日趋强烈。" ["time"]=> int(1450948518) } [13]=> array(11) { ["contentid"]=> int(1297246) ["icon"]=> string(0) "" ["iconsrc"]=> string(0) "" ["title"]=> string(33) "台湾选举提前结束了吗?" ["color"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(46) "http://www.m4.cn/opinion/2015-12/1297246.shtml" ["subtitle"]=> string(0) "" ["suburl"]=> string(0) "" ["thumb"]=> string(47) "http://upload.m4.cn/2015/1224/1450946885538.jpg" ["description"]=> string(108) "本来选战就是中间选民的争夺战,这一次,国民党要找回自己的基本盘,怎么了?" ["time"]=> int(1450946760) } [14]=> array(11) { ["contentid"]=> int(1297058) ["icon"]=> string(0) "" ["iconsrc"]=> string(0) "" ["title"]=> string(90) "清华博士:台湾是“杀出来的奴才,打出来的顺民,惯出来的孽种”" ["color"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(46) "http://www.m4.cn/opinion/2015-12/1297058.shtml" ["subtitle"]=> string(0) "" ["suburl"]=> string(0) "" ["thumb"]=> string(47) "http://upload.m4.cn/2015/1223/1450833056693.png" ["description"]=> string(297) "一直以来,中国政府奉行对台让利政策,对台湾的开放程度远远超过台湾对大陆的开放程度,就已在太阳花运动中被否定的“贸服协定”为例,对大陆的要求几乎全部是高于WTO中的规定,而对台湾却几乎全部是低于WTO的规定。" ["time"]=> int(1450833467) } [15]=> array(11) { ["contentid"]=> int(1297067) ["icon"]=> string(0) "" ["iconsrc"]=> string(0) "" ["title"]=> string(60) "金庸:揭中国人不擅长打仗为何却能赢的真相" ["color"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(46) "http://www.m4.cn/opinion/2015-12/1297067.shtml" ["subtitle"]=> string(0) "" ["suburl"]=> string(0) "" ["thumb"]=> string(47) "http://upload.m4.cn/2015/1223/1450834511242.jpg" ["description"]=> string(243) "现在许多西方学者都认为,地球就这样大了,无止境地追求、扩充,是不可能的,也是不可取的。今後只能接受中国的哲学,要平衡、要和谐,民族与民族之间要相互协作,避免战争。" ["time"]=> int(1450834575) } }

朱维群:达赖与暴力恐怖主义的关系能撇清吗

1深得法国精髓:民众在美高官住宅前倾倒粪便
2乌国安国防秘书长侮辱中国特别代表被解雇
3索纳丽丨你美国人买不起电动汽车,这就是原
4明星球员梅西身价缩水
5加州少女闯警局夺枪!扭打中把自己给崩了
6BBC记者设套遭RT总编辑遭当面打脸
7世贸组织裁决中方胜诉 澳大利亚:接受裁决
8借口“国家安全”,英美瞄准同一家中企
9常规武器中的顶尖之作:体积爆炸物(ОДБ
10美国四胞胎妈妈秀400万美元帐单 网友震惊
11细数美军工复合体如何获取“战争暴利”
12国防部:只要不搞“台独”,就没必要焦虑
13参与抓捕恐怖分子的车臣战士受奖现场
14金与正:朝鲜拒绝与日本进行任何接触
15我国成功发射云海三号02星
16詹姆斯:莫斯科恐袭或令俄乌冲突进一步升级
17加沙空投物资扔海里12人溺亡 6人因踩踏而亡
18俄罗斯安全局破获萨马拉地区恐怖袭击案
192天7条!华春莹连发图文回击美菲操弄南海问
20突发!俄罗斯战机拦截两架美国军机
1江平舟|莫斯科恐袭 美国事先就知情?
2申鹏|他们实现“美国梦”了吗?
3胡懋仁|西方资产阶级带来的观念害人不浅
4突发!俄军发动“最大规模”夜袭
5占豪丨"巴恐"瞄准中国下黑手 不能容忍!
6俄自媒体揭露:全球恐怖势力竟源自单一团伙
7马斯克:美国需要一股"红色浪潮",否则就完
8深得法国精髓:民众在美高官住宅前倾倒粪便
9乌国安国防秘书长侮辱中国特别代表被解雇
10索纳丽丨你美国人买不起电动汽车,这就是原
11金灿荣|不出意外的话,普京将执政到84岁
12基辅称拦截了大部分俄军的导弹 英媒打脸
13美议员施压政府针对中企无人机,大疆回应
14大批移民冲破铁丝网 试图越过美墨边境涌入
15联合国发布!"美国跌出前20" 中国排名上升
16俄副总理:40%的油气出口使用人民币结算
17美国会议员称美国尚未向台湾交付全部已付费
18【组图】神秘的中朝边境
19俄军检查被击毁的美"艾布拉姆斯"坦克残骸
20纽约市真实生活成本曝光 半数家庭靠援助过
1夜央 占豪|央视“国骂”令万千网友“破防
2罗思义|美国耗费巨资试图说服中国内部各种
3许多人曾崇拜西方价值观,但现在幻想破灭…
4胡懋仁|兰德公司的两份报告
5戴旭丨很多国人不知反毛背后的大阴谋,令人
6张文木 | 政治的膨胀与政治的文本——历史
7美军公布:六代机最新进展……
8江平舟|莫斯科恐袭 美国事先就知情?
9占豪丨5艘航母,美国开始介入!中国发出最
10李瑞昌|对毛主席最好的纪念是什么?
11牧心 占豪|中美同时拒签 这一默契将引发重
12金灿荣|大陆海警重拳反击 台湾问题快要解
13司马南|美国为什么怕中国汽车?
14科罗廖夫|温压弹能让敌人缺氧而死 谣传!
15牛弹琴|这两个最新动向,让人瞠目结舌
16张文木丨德国宣战后 苏军上报斯大林的报告
17乔新生|特里芬难题决定了美国经济不可能软
18统一"绊脚石"正被踢开!蔡英文最怕一幕发生
19申鹏|这岛上,又岂止“三害”?
20远航|台独是美国豢养的一条狗